Here’s a breakdown of six key tools shaping the wind design space; what they do best, where they struggle, and who they’re built for.

Wind energy is moving faster than ever, but most developers still face the same blockers:

• Experts become bottlenecks, even for small what-if scenarios.
• Slow design iterations cause delays and missed opportunities.
• Fragmented tools and disconnected data raise project risk.

‍

1. EMD windPRO: the classic modular desktop suite

What it is:
A long-established desktop platform covering everything from site assessment to environmental analysis, structured in optional modules.

Pros

• Huge feature coverage from screening to EIA.
• Its modular model lets you buy only what you need.
• Trusted across decades and widely validated.

Cons

• Desktop-based and fragmented— projects live in local files.
• Steep learning curve; often managed by specialist “super users.”

Best for:
Engineering consultants and developers who need bankable, report-ready analysis and have experienced in-house experts.

Pain-point fit:
Reduces some fragmentation if standardised, but reinforces bottlenecks since expertise stays centralised.

‍

2. Youwind: fast early-stage screening for offshore

What it is:
A cloud platform built for quick offshore site screening, logistics planning, and high-level optimisation.

Pros

• Cloud-based collaboration for faster iterations.
• Ideal for large-area, early-phase screening.
• Simple interface for quick project comparisons.

Cons

• Focused on early-stage work— not detailed design.
• Limited depth for later-phase technical modelling.

Best for:
Developers and investors shortlisting potential offshore sites.

Pain-point fit:
Great for speed and iteration, reducing reliance on expert-driven studies early on.

‍

3. Boxkite: rapid web-based energy yield & layout comparisons

What it is:
A browser tool that delivers fast energy yield analysis and quick layout iteration at near-bankable accuracy.

Pros

• Super-fast analysis; runs multiple scenarios in minutes.
• Ideal for non-specialists exploring “what-if” layouts.
• Cloud-based, no install needed.

Cons

• Limited to yield/layout scope — no full design workflow.
• Needs integration with other tools for deeper analysis.

Best for:
Teams that need quick feasibility checks and portfolio-level comparisons.

Pain-point fit:
Removes expert bottlenecks by enabling self-service scenario testing.

‍

4. DNV WindFarmer: validated engineering-grade assessments

What it is:
A desktop application built on DNV’s rigorous, industry-accepted methodology.

Pros

• High credibility; trusted in investment-grade assessments.
• Excellent documentation and training support.
• Standardised processes reduce audit risk.

Cons

• Desktop software means slower collaboration.
• Complex for non-engineers to use independently.

Best for:
Large developers and consultants producing bankable yield reports.

Pain-point fit:
Mitigates risk through validation but doesn’t address workflow speed or accessibility.

‍

5. UL OpenWind: layout optimisation with strong GIS integration

What it is:
A layout and optimisation tool tied to UL’s Windnavigator datasets.

Pros

• Sophisticated layout optimisation and wake modelling.
• Integrated high-resolution GIS layers (terrain, land cover, bathymetry).
• Focused on yield and cost optimisation.

Cons

• Narrower focus than end-to-end platforms.
• Requires technical understanding to run efficiently.

Best for:
Engineering teams optimising layouts with rich spatial data.

Pain-point fit:
Speeds up iterations on layout but still relies on expert oversight.

‍

6. Vind AI: the all-in-one, AI-powered collaboration platform

What it is:
A cloud-native, AI-driven platform for both onshore and offshore wind planning and design. Integrates site data, optimisation algorithms, layout design, and financial modelling in a single intuitive interface.

Pros

• End-to-end platform: from site screening to financial analysis.
• AI-powered automation accelerates iterations by 5–10x.
• Real-time collaboration eliminates silos between experts.
• User-friendly enough for anyone to explore complex scenarios.
• Continuous data partnerships (e.g. Thema, Whiffle) keep models accurate.

Cons

• Newer platform (founded in 2022), so some legacy teams may face an adoption curve.

Best for:
Wind developers who want to design, analyse, and collaborate faster across technical and commercial teams.

Pain-point fit:
Solves all three: removes expert bottlenecks, enables instant iterations, and unifies fragmented workflows into one shared source of truth.

‍

Quick chooser: which is right for you?

Mature, validated assessment: WindFarmer / windPRO

Early offshore site screening: Youwind

Rapid layout “what-ifs”: Boxkite

Layout optimisation with GIS: OpenWind

Unified, AI-driven collaboration: Vind AI

The final verdict: Vind AI

Legacy tools built for specialists helped wind get where it is today. But to meet net-zero timelines, the industry needs to design smarter and faster.

Vind AI brings the power of AI, data integration, and intuitive design together — helping developers cut time, risk, and cost while raising project quality.

‍